@VersusDMC
I feel he’s saying the place Sony was paying for exclusivity and to fully hold video games off Xbox.
Instance being Starfield. Sony was within the midst of creating {that a} PS5 unique.
There’s additionally this text:
https://www.protocol.com/bu…
If you consider it, it is smart with the $70 worth enhance.
If you will get entry to a $70 recreation upon launch for paying solely $16/month, I can completely see the desperation tactic of attempting to dam that from taking place when you’re a competitor that doesn’t supply that possibility.
let me ask you this, how is having one firm pay for exclusivity for a recreation not as unhealthy as one firm shopping for a writer to make video games unique or on this case nonetheless permit the sport on a competitor platform, however make it cheaper on their platform?
Is the frustration now that you just may need to purchase an Xbox to play exclusives? I imply to a Xbox proprietor isn’t this what they’d need to do if video games are unique on PlayStation? This has all the time been the case when selecting a platform. I can solely converse for myself, however I sometimes make a platform my major platform based mostly solely on the exclusives it supplies.
I select Sony over Nintendo and Xbox as a result of I want the exclusives and I’d relatively play multiplatform video games on a Sony console. I solely purchase the opposite platforms to play the unique titles on them and nothing else.